Next webinarSep 22Rejection of a $5 million offer results in a $56.5 million verdict—Part 2, Voir Dire & OpeningRegister
← All webinars

TLU Case Analysis

TLU Live Vegas 2024 REPLAY - Opening Statement, Direct & Cross Examination PART 1 & 2

Ben Rubinowitz

Ben Rubinowitz

Registering for this webinar will give you access to Parts 1 and 2. Use the same link to watch Part 1 on Nov 18th and Part 2 on Nov 19th.

The bottom line is this. Trial Lawyers need to win the case. Often, the future of the client’s ability to move forward in life and his/her ability to have sufficient funds for medical care, financial independence and adequate compensation for pain and suffering depends on the outcome of the case. While much has been written about trial techniques throughout the years, there are certain time tested and proven tactics and strategies that will allow you to achieve better results for your clients. The goal, at all times, is to maximize the clients recovery. With this in mind, the lectures and workshops that I will be conducting will focus on:

NOV 18th - OPENING STATEMENT

Using your time wisely and strategically will set up the most powerful opening you could ever deliver. The ability to use your voice to modulate the importance of the client’s plight, the importance of this trial and the award of Justice at the end of the case become hallmarks of the opening. In this talk I will show techniques to make the jury understand the importance of the case, the need for monetary compensation and reasons why such an award will serve Justice.

NOV 19th - DIRECT & CROSS-EXAMINATION

Have you ever watched a witness testify on direct and said to yourself — that witness was fantastic - that lawyer is so lucky? Conversely, have you ever watched a witness get destroyed on cross and said to yourself— that witness just fell apart - that lawyer is so lucky? This is not just the luck of the draw. There are reasons the witness exam was successful. This part of the talk will focus on techniques that deal head on with those reasons: How did the lawyer deal with the problem areas? How did the lawyer explore and explain the medicals, the financial and economic loss, and the past and future pain and suffering? How did the lawyer deal with opposing experts - both substantively and through